The SEO MCP server
for content that actually ranks.

Waild MCP plugs into Claude and hands it what no AI has out of the box: live SEO data, competitor intelligence, and a quality gate that refuses to ship slop. Keyword research, briefs, drafts, grading, maintenance — one conversation.

79tools live today
1 call= a writer-ready brief
16/100what slop scores here
AnyGoogle market & language

Watch a real session

Not a mockup — these are replays of recorded conversations with the live server. Click any tool chip to see the actual response Claude received.

Size the market before writing a word
I'm launching an AI note-taking app. Is there search demand, and can a brand-new site actually win any of it?
Read the full transcripts as text

Size the market before writing a word

User: I'm launching an AI note-taking app. Is there search demand, and can a brand-new site actually win any of it?

Tool call: keyword_overview

Claude: There's a real market. “note taking app” is 22,200 searches/month but difficulty 49 — not a first fight for a new domain. Your entry point is “best ai note taking app”: 2,400/month, commercial intent, difficulty only 12. “ai note taking app” adds 4,400/month at difficulty 20. Now let me see what searchers actually ask.

Tool call: serp_question_map

Claude: The questions reveal your angle: people ask “Is an AI note taker legal?” and “What is the safest AI notetaker?” — privacy is a differentiator nobody owns yet. And no featured snippet is live on this SERP: position zero is sitting open.

A brief from the live SERP — and a gate that says no

User: Build the content brief for “best ai note taking app” and start the article.

Tool call: build_content_brief

Claude: The brief is built from the pages that actually rank: a 3,011-word median target, the sections every winner covers, 50 terms with recommended counts, the questions to answer, and an open featured-snippet play. I draft against it — and then the honest part happens. The first draft doesn't get a free pass:

Tool call: grade_draft

Claude: 16 out of 100. It caught “cutting-edge”, “unlock”, and “in conclusion” as AI-tells, flagged the signposting, and measured 119 words against a 3,011-word bar. The loop keeps rewriting and re-grading until the draft clears the target — nothing ships at 16. That gate is the difference between content and slop.

Know exactly who you're up against

User: Notion dominates this space. How strong are they really — should I even try?

Tool call: domain_rank_overview

Tool call: backlinks_summary

Claude: Notion ranks for 656 US keywords worth ~144,000 monthly visits, backed by 11.1M backlinks from 126,359 referring domains. You don't beat that head-on — you route around it. They can't own every long-tail: “best ai note taking app” at difficulty 12 is winnable in months, not years. And before every swing, the winnability gate tells you exactly how big the backlink gap is — so you never spend 3,000 words on a fight you can't win.

What it can do today

The content-SEO engine is built and running. This is the live surface, not a roadmap.

Briefs from the live SERP

One call reads the pages that actually rank and returns a writer-ready brief: outline, word band, term targets, questions, snippet play.

A gate that refuses slop

Every draft is graded 0–100 against the real competition — AI-tells, thin coverage, and template prose get bounced before they ship.

Keyword clustering & topical maps

SERP-overlap clustering decides one-page-vs-many and lays out pillar/spoke plans with the internal links to match.

Winnability before effort

A backlink-gap gate scores every target keyword first, so you never write 3,000 words for a fight you can't win.

Competitor & backlink intel

Domain overviews, keyword intersections, 11M-row backlink profiles, anchors, and gap analysis — the full picture in compact answers.

Maintenance that pays rent

Quick wins, content decay scans, and cannibalization checks run over cached data — the fastest rankings you'll ever get.

Judged, multi-model writing

A pool of writer models drafts; a judge panel scores; only the winner survives. Humanization is a tournament, not a coin flip.

Any market, any language

Location and language are first-class on every call — briefs, grading, and clustering work in the market you're targeting.

Why this SEO MCP server is different

Three categories of AI SEO tools try to solve this. Here's the honest comparison.

Raw API wrappers

Hand your assistant 100 endpoints and a manual — every answer is a wall of JSON it must stitch together itself.

Waild MCP

Server-side workflows return the decision, not the dump: one call, one brief, one verdict. A shared cache makes reruns free.

SEO content editors

A separate app with a score meter — you copy-paste between your writing tool and theirs, per-seat, per-month.

Waild MCP

Lives inside the assistant you already write with. The same data, the same scoring mechanics — as tools Claude wields mid-draft.

Generic AI writing

Fluent, confident, ungrounded — the slop that ranks nowhere and reads like everyone else's slop.

Waild MCP

Grounded in the live SERP, gated by a grader that measures against pages that actually rank, and honest about winnability.

Be first through the door

The engine works today; the doors open soon. Leave an email and get exactly one message when it's live — no drip campaign, no “content”.

Questions

What is this, exactly?

An SEO MCP (Model Context Protocol) server. You connect it to Claude — or any MCP-compatible assistant — and it gains real-time search, keyword, competitor, on-page, and backlink data, plus built-in briefing, grading, and anti-slop gating. You chat like you always do; the tools fire underneath.

What is an MCP server?

A program that gives an AI assistant access to external tools and data through the Model Context Protocol, an open standard introduced by Anthropic in 2024. We wrote a full plain-English explainer of how MCP servers work, with examples and what we learned building this one: what is an MCP server?

Does it only work with Claude?

It's built and tested with Claude first, but MCP is an open standard — OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Gemini adopted it in 2025 — so any MCP-compatible assistant can connect the same server.

Is the demo real?

Yes. The conversations above are replays of actual recorded sessions against the live server — the search volumes, difficulty scores, and backlink counts are all genuine, and so is the first draft that scored 16/100 and got sent back.

What can it do today?

The content-SEO engine is live: SERP-grounded briefs, term-coverage grading, keyword clustering, topical maps, content-gap roadmaps, winnability scoring, quick wins, decay scans, cannibalization checks, backlink analysis, YouTube data, and judged multi-model humanization — in any Google market and language.

What's coming?

A full marketing expansion: link-building campaigns, social content with per-platform grading, ads intelligence, local, e-commerce, AI-search (GEO) tracking, reviews and reputation, and cross-channel planning. Join the waitlist and you'll hear when it opens.